lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 15 May 2019 20:39:15 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <>
To:     Tim Bird <>
Cc:     Veronika Kabatova <>,
        Dhaval Giani <>,
        Sasha Levin <>,
        shuah <>, Kevin Hilman <>,
        LKML <>,
        Steven Rostedt <>,
        Dan Carpenter <>,,
        gustavo padovan <>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <>,
        knut omang <>,
        Eliska Slobodova <>,
        Tim Bird <>
Subject: Re: Linux Testing Microconference at LPC

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 02:02:53PM -0700, Tim Bird wrote:
>I'm in the process now of planning Automated Testing Summit 2019,
>which is tentatively planned for Lyon, France on October 31.  This is
>the day after Embedded Linux Conference Europe and Open Source Summit
>Europe, in Lyon.  I've been working with the
>Linux Foundation event staff to set this up.
>The focus of that event is test standards, including standards for
>test definition, results formats, lab and board management, and APIs
>between elements of the Automated Testing and CI stack.
>I think that the set of things to discuss is somewhat different
>between the Plumbers testing microconference and ATS.  But I hope that
>I'm not fragmenting the space too much.
>With regards to the Testing microconference at Plumbers, I would like
>to do a presentation on the current status of test standards and test
>framework interoperability.  We recently had some good meetings
>between the LAVA and Fuego people at Linaro Connect
>on this topic.

Hi Tim,

Sorry for the delayed response, this mail got marked as read as a result
of fat fingers :(

I'd want to avoid having an 'overview' talk as part of the MC. We have
quite a few discussion topics this year and in the spirit of LPC I'd
prefer to avoid presentations.

Maybe it's more appropriate for the refereed track?


Powered by blists - more mailing lists