lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 16 May 2019 16:55:33 +0100
From:   Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>,
        bp@...e.de, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
        "Dominik Brodowski" <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 28/86] x86/speculation: Simplify the CPU bug
 detection logic

3.16.68-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>

commit 8ecc4979b1bd9c94168e6fc92960033b7a951336 upstream.

Only CPUs which speculate can speculate. Therefore, it seems prudent
to test for cpu_no_speculation first and only then determine whether
a specific speculating CPU is susceptible to store bypass speculation.
This is underlined by all CPUs currently listed in cpu_no_speculation
were present in cpu_no_spec_store_bypass as well.

Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: bp@...e.de
Cc: konrad.wilk@...cle.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180522090539.GA24668@light.dominikbrodowski.net
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 22 +++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -825,12 +825,8 @@ static const __initconst struct x86_cpu_
 	{}
 };
 
+/* Only list CPUs which speculate but are non susceptible to SSB */
 static const __initconst struct x86_cpu_id cpu_no_spec_store_bypass[] = {
-	{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL,	6,	INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_PINEVIEW	},
-	{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL,	6,	INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_LINCROFT	},
-	{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL,	6,	INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_PENWELL		},
-	{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL,	6,	INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_CLOVERVIEW	},
-	{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL,	6,	INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_CEDARVIEW	},
 	{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL,	6,	INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_SILVERMONT1	},
 	{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL,	6,	INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_AIRMONT		},
 	{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL,	6,	INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_SILVERMONT2	},
@@ -838,14 +834,10 @@ static const __initconst struct x86_cpu_
 	{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL,	6,	INTEL_FAM6_CORE_YONAH		},
 	{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL,	6,	INTEL_FAM6_XEON_PHI_KNL		},
 	{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL,	6,	INTEL_FAM6_XEON_PHI_KNM		},
-	{ X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR,	5,					},
-	{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL,	5,					},
-	{ X86_VENDOR_NSC,	5,					},
 	{ X86_VENDOR_AMD,	0x12,					},
 	{ X86_VENDOR_AMD,	0x11,					},
 	{ X86_VENDOR_AMD,	0x10,					},
 	{ X86_VENDOR_AMD,	0xf,					},
-	{ X86_VENDOR_ANY,	4,					},
 	{}
 };
 
@@ -868,6 +860,12 @@ static void __init cpu_set_bug_bits(stru
 {
 	u64 ia32_cap = 0;
 
+	if (x86_match_cpu(cpu_no_speculation))
+		return;
+
+	setup_force_cpu_bug(X86_BUG_SPECTRE_V1);
+	setup_force_cpu_bug(X86_BUG_SPECTRE_V2);
+
 	if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_ARCH_CAPABILITIES))
 		rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES, ia32_cap);
 
@@ -876,12 +874,6 @@ static void __init cpu_set_bug_bits(stru
 	   !cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSB_NO))
 		setup_force_cpu_bug(X86_BUG_SPEC_STORE_BYPASS);
 
-	if (x86_match_cpu(cpu_no_speculation))
-		return;
-
-	setup_force_cpu_bug(X86_BUG_SPECTRE_V1);
-	setup_force_cpu_bug(X86_BUG_SPECTRE_V2);
-
 	if (ia32_cap & ARCH_CAP_IBRS_ALL)
 		setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_IBRS_ENHANCED);
 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists