[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aad06de6-b85c-b549-5653-45f9c4ebb384@free.fr>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 17:59:58 +0200
From: Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
arm-soc <arm@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 1/4] ARM: SoC platform updates
On 16/05/2019 17:33, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 11:43 PM Olof Johansson wrote:
>>
>> SoC updates, mostly refactorings and cleanups of old legacy platforms.
>> Major themes this release:
>
> Hmm. This brings in a new warning:
>
> drivers/clocksource/timer-ixp4xx.c:78:20: warning:
> ‘ixp4xx_read_sched_clock’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>
> because that drivers is enabled for build testing, but that function
> is only used under
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> sched_clock_register(ixp4xx_read_sched_clock, 32, timer_freq);
> #endif
>
> It's not clear why that #ifdef is there. This driver only builds
> non-ARM when COMPILE_TEST is enabled, and that #ifdef actually breaks
> that build test.
>
> I'm going to remove that #ifdef in my merge, because I do *not* want
> to see new warnings, and it doesn't seem to make any sense.
>
> Maybe that's the wrong resolution, please holler and let me know if
> you want something else.
Hello BDFL,
Your email client did something strange by changing
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
to
"linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
which is odd ;-)
As for your actual remark, I note that Olof has an arm/late branch
(which I assume he plans to submit in a few days?) which contains
the change you mention:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc.git/log/?h=arm/late
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc.git/commit/?h=arm/late&id=5cb9de627e25421e2e2edaff6360c84d32cd3c02
Regards.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists