linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] drm/doc: Allow new UAPI to be used once it's in drm-next/drm-misc-next.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87a7fmbbiq.fsf@anholt.net>
Date:   Thu, 16 May 2019 09:38:05 -0700
From:   Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
To:     Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] drm/doc: Allow new UAPI to be used once it's in drm-next/drm-misc-next.

Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> writes:

> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 03:06:38PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> I was trying to figure out if it was permissible to merge the Mesa
>> side of V3D's CSD support yet while it's in drm-misc-next but not
>> drm-next, and developers on #dri-devel IRC had differing opinions of
>> what the requirement was.
>> 
>> v2: Restrict to just drm-next or drm-misc-next on airlied's request.
>
> Personally I think that's a bit too strict (if people want to screw up,
> they will be able to anyway). But since I'm all for clearer rules where
> possible, this has my support too.
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>

Pushed to drm-misc-next now.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)