[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190516165648.GB21857@zn.tnic>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 18:56:48 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Ghannam, Yazen" <Yazen.Ghannam@....com>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] x86/MCE: Save MCA control bits that get set in
hardware
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 04:14:14PM +0000, Ghannam, Yazen wrote:
> I can put a vendor check on the read. Is that sufficient?
Or we can drop this patch. Remind me again pls why do we need it?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists