lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <68075828-8fd7-adbb-c1d9-5eb39fbf18cb@suse.cz>
Date:   Fri, 17 May 2019 06:48:37 +0200
From:   Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: make it work on sparse non-0-node systems

On 16. 05. 19, 15:59, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> However, I tend to agree with Michal that (ab)using node[0].memcg_lrus
>> to check if a list_lru is memcg aware looks confusing. I guess we could
>> simply add a bool flag to list_lru instead. Something like this, may be:
> 
> Yes, this makes much more sense to me!

I am not sure if I should send a patch with this solution or Vladimir
will (given he is an author and has a diff already)?

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ