[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <65852894-2525-e67e-5fd3-55ba4a323c2f@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 09:07:30 +0200
From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@...hat.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>, eric.auger.pro@...il.com,
joro@...tes.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dwmw2@...radead.org,
lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, robin.murphy@....com,
will.deacon@....com, hanjun.guo@...aro.org, sudeep.holla@....com
Cc: alex.williamson@...hat.com, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] iommu/vt-d: Differentiate relaxable and non
relaxable RMRRs
Hi Lu,
On 5/17/19 6:46 AM, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 5/16/19 6:08 PM, Eric Auger wrote:
>> Now we have a new IOMMU_RESV_DIRECT_RELAXABLE reserved memory
>> region type, let's report USB and GFX RMRRs as relaxable ones.
>>
>> This allows to have a finer reporting at IOMMU API level of
>> reserved memory regions. This will be exploitable by VFIO to
>> define the usable IOVA range and detect potential conflicts
>> between the guest physical address space and host reserved
>> regions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 10 ++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>> index a36604f4900f..af1d65fdedfc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>> @@ -5493,7 +5493,9 @@ static void intel_iommu_get_resv_regions(struct
>> device *device,
>> for_each_rmrr_units(rmrr) {
>> for_each_active_dev_scope(rmrr->devices, rmrr->devices_cnt,
>> i, i_dev) {
>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(device);
>
> Probably should be:
>
> struct pci_dev *pdev = dev_is_pci(device) ? to_pci_dev(device) : NULL;
That's correct. I will fix that asap.
Thanks!
Eric
>
> Best regards,
> Lu Baolu
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists