[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFLxGvyZCpKthJevFHjjBQXo=j5f-FUip0MAsLy0HaoJzLZ2rA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 10:12:21 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To: Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mtd: nand: raw: brcmnand: When oops in progress
use pio and interrupt polling
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 6:42 PM Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@...il.com> wrote:
>
> If mtd_oops is in progress, switch to polling during NAND command
> completion instead of relying on DMA/interrupts so that the mtd_oops
> buffer can be completely written in the assigned NAND partition.
With the new flag the semantics change, as soon a panic write happened,
the flag will stay and *all* future operates will take the polling/pio path.
IMHO this is fine since the kernel cannot recover from an oops.
But just to make sure we all get this. :-)
An alternative would be to block all further non-panic writes.
--
Thanks,
//richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists