lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0kKb7njiJvUkwJYwf-yc-hEyErSiWcvbdf0XnMoctzrg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 May 2019 10:58:37 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@....com>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>,
        Kishon <kishon@...com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "M.h. Lian" <minghuan.lian@....com>,
        Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@....com>, Roy Zang <roy.zang@....com>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
        Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
        linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: ls1028a: Add PCIe controller DT nodes

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 5:21 AM Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@....com> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 9:36 AM Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@....com> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@....com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi |   52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> > index b045812..50b579b 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> > @@ -398,6 +398,58 @@
> >                         status = "disabled";
> >                 };
> >
> > +               pcie@...0000 {
> > +                       compatible = "fsl,ls1028a-pcie";
> > +                       reg = <0x00 0x03400000 0x0 0x00100000   /* controller registers */
> > +                              0x80 0x00000000 0x0 0x00002000>; /* configuration space */
> > +                       reg-names = "regs", "config";
> > +                       interrupts = <GIC_SPI 108 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, /* PME interrupt */
> > +                                    <GIC_SPI 109 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; /* aer interrupt */
> > +                       interrupt-names = "pme", "aer";
> > +                       #address-cells = <3>;
> > +                       #size-cells = <2>;
> > +                       device_type = "pci";
> > +                       dma-coherent;
> > +                       num-lanes = <4>;
> > +                       bus-range = <0x0 0xff>;
> > +                       ranges = <0x81000000 0x0 0x00000000 0x80 0x00010000 0x0 0x00010000   /* downstream I/O */
> > +                                 0x82000000 0x0 0x40000000 0x80 0x40000000 0x0 0x40000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */
>
> Are you sure there is no support for 64-bit BARs or prefetchable memory?
> [Xiaowei Bao] sorry for late reply, Thought that our Layerscape platform has not added prefetchable memory support in DTS, so this platform has not been added, I will submit a separate patch to add prefetchable memory support for all Layerscape platforms.

Ok, thanks.

> Of course, the prefetchable PCIE device can work in our boards, because the RC will
> assign non-prefetchable memory for this device. We reserve 1G no-prefetchable
> memory for PCIE device, it is enough for general devices.

Sure, many devices work just fine, this is mostly a question of supporting those
devices that do require multiple gigabytes, or that need prefetchable memory
semantics to get the expected performance. GPUs are the obvious example,
but I think there are others (infiniband?).

      Arnd

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ