[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0kKb7njiJvUkwJYwf-yc-hEyErSiWcvbdf0XnMoctzrg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 10:58:37 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@....com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>,
Kishon <kishon@...com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"M.h. Lian" <minghuan.lian@....com>,
Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@....com>, Roy Zang <roy.zang@....com>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: ls1028a: Add PCIe controller DT nodes
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 5:21 AM Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@....com> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 9:36 AM Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@....com> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@....com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> > index b045812..50b579b 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> > @@ -398,6 +398,58 @@
> > status = "disabled";
> > };
> >
> > + pcie@...0000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,ls1028a-pcie";
> > + reg = <0x00 0x03400000 0x0 0x00100000 /* controller registers */
> > + 0x80 0x00000000 0x0 0x00002000>; /* configuration space */
> > + reg-names = "regs", "config";
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 108 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, /* PME interrupt */
> > + <GIC_SPI 109 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; /* aer interrupt */
> > + interrupt-names = "pme", "aer";
> > + #address-cells = <3>;
> > + #size-cells = <2>;
> > + device_type = "pci";
> > + dma-coherent;
> > + num-lanes = <4>;
> > + bus-range = <0x0 0xff>;
> > + ranges = <0x81000000 0x0 0x00000000 0x80 0x00010000 0x0 0x00010000 /* downstream I/O */
> > + 0x82000000 0x0 0x40000000 0x80 0x40000000 0x0 0x40000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */
>
> Are you sure there is no support for 64-bit BARs or prefetchable memory?
> [Xiaowei Bao] sorry for late reply, Thought that our Layerscape platform has not added prefetchable memory support in DTS, so this platform has not been added, I will submit a separate patch to add prefetchable memory support for all Layerscape platforms.
Ok, thanks.
> Of course, the prefetchable PCIE device can work in our boards, because the RC will
> assign non-prefetchable memory for this device. We reserve 1G no-prefetchable
> memory for PCIE device, it is enough for general devices.
Sure, many devices work just fine, this is mostly a question of supporting those
devices that do require multiple gigabytes, or that need prefetchable memory
semantics to get the expected performance. GPUs are the obvious example,
but I think there are others (infiniband?).
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists