[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190517093000.GO16681@xz-x1>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 17:30:00 +0800
From: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: selftests: Compile code with warnings enabled
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 11:04:45AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> So far the KVM selftests are compiled without any compiler warnings
> enabled. That's quite bad, since we miss a lot of possible bugs this
> way. Let's enable at least "-Wall" and some other useful warning flags
> now, and fix at least the trivial problems in the code (like unused
> variables).
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Rebased to kvm/queue
> - Fix warnings in state_test.c and evmcs_test.c, too
I still see these warnings (probably because the hyperv_cpuid.c is a
new test):
In file included from x86_64/hyperv_cpuid.c:18:
x86_64/hyperv_cpuid.c: In function ‘test_hv_cpuid’:
x86_64/hyperv_cpuid.c:61:33: warning: suggest parentheses around comparison in operand of ‘==’ [-Wparentheses]
TEST_ASSERT(entry->padding[0] == entry->padding[1]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/test_util.h:32:15: note: in definition of macro ‘TEST_ASSERT’
test_assert((e), #e, __FILE__, __LINE__, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
^
x86_64/hyperv_cpuid.c:62:8: warning: suggest parentheses around comparison in operand of ‘==’ [-Wparentheses]
TEST_ASSERT(entry->padding[0] == entry->padding[1]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
== entry->padding[2] == 0,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/test_util.h:32:15: note: in definition of macro ‘TEST_ASSERT’
test_assert((e), #e, __FILE__, __LINE__, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
^
x86_64/hyperv_cpuid.c: In function ‘kvm_get_supported_hv_cpuid’:
x86_64/hyperv_cpuid.c:93:6: warning: unused variable ‘ret’ [-Wunused-variable]
int ret;
^~~
The first two seem to be real bugs in the test code, and the 3rd one
might need a cleanup too.
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists