[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a9767b82-9b3c-fc05-5f33-fb79c8fc8507@embed.me.uk>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 10:17:02 +0100
From: Jack Mitchell <ml@...ed.me.uk>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
"kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>
Cc: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@...labora.com>,
mgalka@...labora.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, matthew.hart@...aro.org,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Subject: Re: next/master boot bisection: next-20190514 on rk3288-veyron-jaq
On 16/05/2019 22:38, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> From: kernelci.org bot <bot@...nelci.org>
> Date: Tue, May 14, 2019 at 9:06 AM
> To: <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>, <guillaume.tucker@...labora.com>,
> <mgalka@...labora.com>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
> <matthew.hart@...aro.org>, <khilman@...libre.com>,
> <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>, Elaine Zhang, Eduardo Valentin, Daniel
> Lezcano
> Cc: Heiko Stuebner, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
> <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
> Zhang Rui, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
>
>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>> * This automated bisection report was sent to you on the basis *
>> * that you may be involved with the breaking commit it has *
>> * found. No manual investigation has been done to verify it, *
>> * and the root cause of the problem may be somewhere else. *
>> * Hope this helps! *
>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>>
>> next/master boot bisection: next-20190514 on rk3288-veyron-jaq
>>
>> Summary:
>> Start: 0a13f187b16a Add linux-next specific files for 20190514
>> Details: https://kernelci.org/boot/id/5cda7f2259b514876d7a3628
>> Plain log: https://storage.kernelci.org//next/master/next-20190514/arm/multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_EFI=y+CONFIG_ARM_LPAE=y/gcc-8/lab-collabora/boot-rk3288-veyron-jaq.txt
>> HTML log: https://storage.kernelci.org//next/master/next-20190514/arm/multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_EFI=y+CONFIG_ARM_LPAE=y/gcc-8/lab-collabora/boot-rk3288-veyron-jaq.html
>> Result: 691d4947face thermal: rockchip: fix up the tsadc pinctrl setting error
>>
>> Checks:
>> revert: PASS
>> verify: PASS
>>
>> Parameters:
>> Tree: next
>> URL: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
>> Branch: master
>> Target: rk3288-veyron-jaq
>> CPU arch: arm
>> Lab: lab-collabora
>> Compiler: gcc-8
>> Config: multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_EFI=y+CONFIG_ARM_LPAE=y
>> Test suite: boot
>>
>> Breaking commit found:
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> commit 691d4947faceb8bd841900049e07c81c95ca4b0d
>> Author: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>
>> Date: Tue Apr 30 18:09:44 2019 +0800
>>
>> thermal: rockchip: fix up the tsadc pinctrl setting error
>>
>> Explicitly use the pinctrl to set/unset the right mode
>> instead of relying on the pinctrl init mode.
>> And it requires setting the tshut polarity before select pinctrl.
>>
>> When the temperature sensor mode is set to 0, it will automatically
>> reset the board via the Clock-Reset-Unit (CRU) if the over temperature
>> threshold is reached. However, when the pinctrl initializes, it does a
>> transition to "otp_out" which may lead the SoC restart all the time.
>>
>> "otp_out" IO may be connected to the RESET circuit on the hardware.
>> If the IO is in the wrong state, it will trigger RESET.
>> (similar to the effect of pressing the RESET button)
>> which will cause the soc to restart all the time.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
>
> I can confirm that the above commit breaks my jerry, though I haven't
> dug into the details. :( Is anyone fixing? For now I'm just booting
> with the revert.
>
>
> -Doug
I can also confirm that this breaks boot on our custom board which is
very similar to the rk3288-Firefly. In my scenario the processor just
seems to "hang", no reset occurs if that helps debug matters.
Regards,
Jack.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists