linux-kernel - Re: Linux 4.19 and GCC 9

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190517152200.GI8945@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 17 May 2019 12:22:00 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
To:     Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ivan Babrou <ivan@...udflare.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-team <kernel-team@...udflare.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 4.19 and GCC 9

Em Fri, May 17, 2019 at 11:01:45AM +0200, Miguel Ojeda escreveu:
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 10:51 AM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 10:35:29AM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 9:38 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Right; if there is anything you can reproduce on linus.git I'll happily
> > > > have a look. If it doesn't reproduce all you have to do is find the
> > > > patches that make it work and ask Greg.
> > >
> > > Just to clarify: Linus' master is clean of these issues with GCC 9.1.1.
> >
> > Great!  Care to find the patches that did that work and send me the git
> > commit ids so that I can queue them up?  I don't have gcc9 here yet on
> > my systems, so I can not test for this.
> 
> I am unsure about the perf and the objtools parts (Peter/Josh?), but

I'm not noticing these while building upstream perf with gcc 9.1.1 on at
least fedora:30.

    33	fedora:30                     : Ok   gcc (GCC) 9.1.1 20190503 (Red Hat 9.1.1-1)

> about the -Wmissing-attributes I cleaned, they were these:
 
> a6e60d84989f ("include/linux/module.h: copy __init/__exit attrs to
> init/cleanup_module")
> c0d9782f5b6d ("Compiler Attributes: add support for __copy (gcc >= 9)")
> ff98e20ef208 ("lib/crc32.c: mark crc32_le_base/__crc32c_le_base
> aliases as __pure")
> 
> Cheers,
> Miguel

-- 

- Arnaldo