linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] kbuild: check uniqueness of module names

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQMCfEE2ncrGj3Cair8udQZea_ZsTGGSsFA_7T86-7vRA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 18 May 2019 01:23:55 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
        Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@...il.com>,
        Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...il.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kbuild: check uniqueness of module names

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 2:34 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Masahiro,
>
> Thanks for this, looks good to me.  Just a nit below.
>
> On Fri, 17 May 2019 13:27:53 +0900 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> >
>
> > diff --git a/scripts/modules-check.sh b/scripts/modules-check.sh
> > new file mode 100755
> > index 000000000000..c875f6eab01e
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/scripts/modules-check.sh
> > @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> > +#!/bin/sh
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +
> > +set -e
> > +
> > +# Check uniqueness of module names
> > +check_same_name_modules()
> > +{
> > +     same_name_modules=$(cat modules.order modules.builtin | \
>                                                                 ^
> This trailing '\' is unnecessary after a pipe symbol.


With the suggestion from Alexander Kapshuk,
the code in v3 became short enough to fit in 80-columns.

Anyway, thanks for pointing it out.





> > +                             xargs -r basename -a -- | sort | uniq -d)
> > +
> > +     for m in $same_name_modules
> > +     do
> > +             echo "warning: same basename if the following are built as modules:" >&2
> > +             grep -h -e "/$m" modules.order modules.builtin | \
>
> Same here
>
> > +                                             sed 's:^kernel/:  :' >&2
> > +     done
> > +}
> > +
> > +check_same_name_modules
>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen ROthwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada