[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190517171507.96046-1-dvyukov@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 19:15:07 +0200
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...il.com>
To: catalin.marinas@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] kmemleak: fix check for softirq context
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
in_softirq() is a wrong predicate to check if we are in a softirq context.
It also returns true if we have BH disabled, so objects are falsely
stamped with "softirq" comm. The correct predicate is in_serving_softirq().
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
---
mm/kmemleak.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c
index e57bf810f7983..6584ff9778895 100644
--- a/mm/kmemleak.c
+++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
@@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ static struct kmemleak_object *create_object(unsigned long ptr, size_t size,
if (in_irq()) {
object->pid = 0;
strncpy(object->comm, "hardirq", sizeof(object->comm));
- } else if (in_softirq()) {
+ } else if (in_serving_softirq()) {
object->pid = 0;
strncpy(object->comm, "softirq", sizeof(object->comm));
} else {
--
2.21.0.1020.gf2820cf01a-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists