[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190517194405.GA28795@agluck-desk>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 12:44:05 -0700
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: "Ghannam, Yazen" <Yazen.Ghannam@....com>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] x86/MCE: Save MCA control bits that get set in
hardware
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 09:34:31PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 11:06:07AM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > and thus end up with that extra level on indent for the rest
> > of the function.
>
> Ok:
>
> @@ -1569,7 +1575,13 @@ static void __mcheck_cpu_init_clear_banks(void)
>
> if (!b->init)
> continue;
> +
> + /* Check if any bits are implemented in h/w */
> wrmsrl(msr_ops.ctl(i), b->ctl);
> + rdmsrl(msr_ops.ctl(i), msrval);
> +
> + b->init = !!msrval;
> +
> wrmsrl(msr_ops.status(i), 0);
> }
Much neater :-)
Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists