[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190519202753.p5hsfe2uqmgsfbcq@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2019 22:27:53 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Haller <thaller@...hat.com>,
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 41/51] fib_rules: return 0 directly if an exactly
same rule exists when NLM_F_EXCL not supplied
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 12:56:16PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
> >
> > [ Upstream commit e9919a24d3022f72bcadc407e73a6ef17093a849 ]
[..]
> > Fixes: 153380ec4b9 ("fib_rules: Added NLM_F_EXCL support to fib_nl_newrule")
> > Reported-by: Thomas Haller <thaller@...hat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > ---
> > net/core/fib_rules.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > --- a/net/core/fib_rules.c
> > +++ b/net/core/fib_rules.c
> > @@ -429,9 +429,9 @@ int fib_nl_newrule(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > if (rule->l3mdev && rule->table)
> > goto errout_free;
> >
> > - if ((nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_EXCL) &&
> > - rule_exists(ops, frh, tb, rule)) {
> > - err = -EEXIST;
> > + if (rule_exists(ops, frh, tb, rule)) {
> > + if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_EXCL)
> > + err = -EEXIST;
> This commit is causing issues on Android devices when Wi-Fi and mobile
> data are both enabled. The device will do a soft reboot consistently.
Not surprising, the patch can't be applied to 4.9 as-is.
In 4.9, code looks like this:
err = -EINVAL;
/* irrelevant */
if (rule_exists(ops, frh, tb, rule)) {
if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_EXCL)
err = -EEXIST;
goto errout_free;
}
So, if rule_exists() is true, we return -EINVAL to caller
instead of 0, unlike upstream.
I don't think this commit is stable material.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists