[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190519204012.31861-3-brgl@bgdev.pl>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2019 22:40:12 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] eeprom: at24: drop unnecessary label
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
If we move the nvmem registration above the pm enable calls and the
test read, we can drop the error label and make the code more readable
as there's now only a single place where we must call
pm_runtime_disable() in error path.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
---
drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
index 9ea196f0749f..0bc0a45fb98e 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
@@ -689,23 +689,6 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
return err;
}
- i2c_set_clientdata(client, at24);
-
- /* enable runtime pm */
- pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
- pm_runtime_enable(dev);
-
- /*
- * Perform a one-byte test read to verify that the
- * chip is functional.
- */
- err = at24_read(at24, 0, &test_byte, 1);
- pm_runtime_idle(dev);
- if (err) {
- err = -ENODEV;
- goto err_runtime_pm;
- }
-
nvmem_config.name = dev_name(dev);
nvmem_config.dev = dev;
nvmem_config.read_only = !writable;
@@ -721,9 +704,24 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
nvmem_config.size = byte_len;
at24->nvmem = devm_nvmem_register(dev, &nvmem_config);
- if (IS_ERR(at24->nvmem)) {
- err = PTR_ERR(at24->nvmem);
- goto err_runtime_pm;
+ if (IS_ERR(at24->nvmem))
+ return PTR_ERR(at24->nvmem);
+
+ i2c_set_clientdata(client, at24);
+
+ /* enable runtime pm */
+ pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
+ pm_runtime_enable(dev);
+
+ /*
+ * Perform a one-byte test read to verify that the
+ * chip is functional.
+ */
+ err = at24_read(at24, 0, &test_byte, 1);
+ pm_runtime_idle(dev);
+ if (err) {
+ pm_runtime_disable(dev);
+ return -ENODEV;
}
dev_info(dev, "%u byte %s EEPROM, %s, %u bytes/write\n",
@@ -731,11 +729,6 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
writable ? "writable" : "read-only", at24->write_max);
return 0;
-
-err_runtime_pm:
- pm_runtime_disable(dev);
-
- return err;
}
static int at24_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
--
2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists