linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tracing: silence GCC 9 array bounds warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190519173518.5f40adfb@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Sun, 19 May 2019 17:35:18 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: silence GCC 9 array bounds warning

On Fri, 17 May 2019 21:09:21 +0200
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:

> By the way, how do you all feel about moving this as a generic
> facility to zero out the suffix/prefix of an structure? In particular,
> since we won't have the LAT* stuff according to Steven.

Is this done in other places? If so, how many.

Note, the LAT* update doesn't belong in the iterator reset function,
but the pos = -1 still does.

Thanks!

-- Steve