| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20190520115246.047284657@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 14:13:15 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.0 015/123] arm64: arch_timer: Ensure counter register reads occur with seqlock held
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
commit 75a19a0202db21638a1c2b424afb867e1f9a2376 upstream.
When executing clock_gettime(), either in the vDSO or via a system call,
we need to ensure that the read of the counter register occurs within
the seqlock reader critical section. This ensures that updates to the
clocksource parameters (e.g. the multiplier) are consistent with the
counter value and therefore avoids the situation where time appears to
go backwards across multiple reads.
Extend the vDSO logic so that the seqlock critical section covers the
read of the counter register as well as accesses to the data page. Since
reads of the counter system registers are not ordered by memory barrier
instructions, introduce dependency ordering from the counter read to a
subsequent memory access so that the seqlock memory barriers apply to
the counter access in both the vDSO and the system call paths.
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Tested-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/alpine.DEB.2.21.1902081950260.1662@nanos.tec.linutronix.de/
Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday.S | 15 +++++++++++----
2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h
@@ -148,18 +148,47 @@ static inline void arch_timer_set_cntkct
isb();
}
+/*
+ * Ensure that reads of the counter are treated the same as memory reads
+ * for the purposes of ordering by subsequent memory barriers.
+ *
+ * This insanity brought to you by speculative system register reads,
+ * out-of-order memory accesses, sequence locks and Thomas Gleixner.
+ *
+ * http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2019-February/631195.html
+ */
+#define arch_counter_enforce_ordering(val) do { \
+ u64 tmp, _val = (val); \
+ \
+ asm volatile( \
+ " eor %0, %1, %1\n" \
+ " add %0, sp, %0\n" \
+ " ldr xzr, [%0]" \
+ : "=r" (tmp) : "r" (_val)); \
+} while (0)
+
static inline u64 arch_counter_get_cntpct(void)
{
+ u64 cnt;
+
isb();
- return arch_timer_reg_read_stable(cntpct_el0);
+ cnt = arch_timer_reg_read_stable(cntpct_el0);
+ arch_counter_enforce_ordering(cnt);
+ return cnt;
}
static inline u64 arch_counter_get_cntvct(void)
{
+ u64 cnt;
+
isb();
- return arch_timer_reg_read_stable(cntvct_el0);
+ cnt = arch_timer_reg_read_stable(cntvct_el0);
+ arch_counter_enforce_ordering(cnt);
+ return cnt;
}
+#undef arch_counter_enforce_ordering
+
static inline int arch_timer_arch_init(void)
{
return 0;
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday.S
@@ -73,6 +73,13 @@ x_tmp .req x8
movn x_tmp, #0xff00, lsl #48
and \res, x_tmp, \res
mul \res, \res, \mult
+ /*
+ * Fake address dependency from the value computed from the counter
+ * register to subsequent data page accesses so that the sequence
+ * locking also orders the read of the counter.
+ */
+ and x_tmp, \res, xzr
+ add vdso_data, vdso_data, x_tmp
.endm
/*
@@ -147,12 +154,12 @@ ENTRY(__kernel_gettimeofday)
/* w11 = cs_mono_mult, w12 = cs_shift */
ldp w11, w12, [vdso_data, #VDSO_CS_MONO_MULT]
ldp x13, x14, [vdso_data, #VDSO_XTIME_CLK_SEC]
- seqcnt_check fail=1b
get_nsec_per_sec res=x9
lsl x9, x9, x12
get_clock_shifted_nsec res=x15, cycle_last=x10, mult=x11
+ seqcnt_check fail=1b
get_ts_realtime res_sec=x10, res_nsec=x11, \
clock_nsec=x15, xtime_sec=x13, xtime_nsec=x14, nsec_to_sec=x9
@@ -211,13 +218,13 @@ realtime:
/* w11 = cs_mono_mult, w12 = cs_shift */
ldp w11, w12, [vdso_data, #VDSO_CS_MONO_MULT]
ldp x13, x14, [vdso_data, #VDSO_XTIME_CLK_SEC]
- seqcnt_check fail=realtime
/* All computations are done with left-shifted nsecs. */
get_nsec_per_sec res=x9
lsl x9, x9, x12
get_clock_shifted_nsec res=x15, cycle_last=x10, mult=x11
+ seqcnt_check fail=realtime
get_ts_realtime res_sec=x10, res_nsec=x11, \
clock_nsec=x15, xtime_sec=x13, xtime_nsec=x14, nsec_to_sec=x9
clock_gettime_return, shift=1
@@ -231,7 +238,6 @@ monotonic:
ldp w11, w12, [vdso_data, #VDSO_CS_MONO_MULT]
ldp x13, x14, [vdso_data, #VDSO_XTIME_CLK_SEC]
ldp x3, x4, [vdso_data, #VDSO_WTM_CLK_SEC]
- seqcnt_check fail=monotonic
/* All computations are done with left-shifted nsecs. */
lsl x4, x4, x12
@@ -239,6 +245,7 @@ monotonic:
lsl x9, x9, x12
get_clock_shifted_nsec res=x15, cycle_last=x10, mult=x11
+ seqcnt_check fail=monotonic
get_ts_realtime res_sec=x10, res_nsec=x11, \
clock_nsec=x15, xtime_sec=x13, xtime_nsec=x14, nsec_to_sec=x9
@@ -253,13 +260,13 @@ monotonic_raw:
/* w11 = cs_raw_mult, w12 = cs_shift */
ldp w12, w11, [vdso_data, #VDSO_CS_SHIFT]
ldp x13, x14, [vdso_data, #VDSO_RAW_TIME_SEC]
- seqcnt_check fail=monotonic_raw
/* All computations are done with left-shifted nsecs. */
get_nsec_per_sec res=x9
lsl x9, x9, x12
get_clock_shifted_nsec res=x15, cycle_last=x10, mult=x11
+ seqcnt_check fail=monotonic_raw
get_ts_clock_raw res_sec=x10, res_nsec=x11, \
clock_nsec=x15, nsec_to_sec=x9
Powered by blists - more mailing lists