[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MN2PR18MB318292E37F3AB9383D9FBE0FA1060@MN2PR18MB3182.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 13:16:23 +0000
From: Michal Kalderon <mkalderon@...vell.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, "leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>,
"apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: add test for empty line after Fixes
statement
> From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2019 3:57 PM
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: add test for empty line after Fixes
> statement
>
> External Email
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> On Mon, 2019-05-20 at 15:42 +0300, Michal Kalderon wrote:
> > Check that there is no empty line after a fixes statement
>
> why?
>
This comment is given a lot on the netdev and rdma mailing lists when patches are submitted with
an empty line between Fixes: tag and SOB tags. Since "Fixes:" is just another tag and should be kept
together with the other ones.
thanks,
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists