[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1558359688-21804-1-git-send-email-lukasz.odzioba@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 15:41:28 +0200
From: Lukasz Odzioba <lukasz.odzioba@...el.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: dwmw2@...radead.org, joro@...tes.org, lukasz.odzioba@...el.com,
grzegorz.andrejczuk@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Remove unnecessary rcu_read_locks
We use RCU's for rarely updated lists like iommus, rmrr, atsr units.
I'm not sure why domain_remove_dev_info() in domain_exit() was surrounded
by rcu_read_lock. Lock was present before refactoring in d160aca527,
but it was related to rcu list, not domain_remove_dev_info function.
dmar_remove_one_dev_info() doesn't touch any of those lists, so it doesn't
require a lock. In fact it is called 6 times without it anyway.
Fixes: d160aca5276d ("iommu/vt-d: Unify domain->iommu attach/detachment")
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Odzioba <lukasz.odzioba@...el.com>
---
drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
index a209199..1b7ad80 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
@@ -1911,9 +1911,7 @@ static void domain_exit(struct dmar_domain *domain)
struct page *freelist;
/* Remove associated devices and clear attached or cached domains */
- rcu_read_lock();
domain_remove_dev_info(domain);
- rcu_read_unlock();
/* destroy iovas */
put_iova_domain(&domain->iovad);
@@ -5254,9 +5252,7 @@ static int intel_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
old_domain = find_domain(dev);
if (old_domain) {
- rcu_read_lock();
dmar_remove_one_dev_info(dev);
- rcu_read_unlock();
if (!domain_type_is_vm_or_si(old_domain) &&
list_empty(&old_domain->devices))
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists