linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] i2c-ocores: sifive: add polling mode workaround for FU540-C000 SoC.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 20 May 2019 20:50:06 +0530
From:   Sagar Kadam <sagar.kadam@...ive.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, peter@...sgaard.com,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] i2c-ocores: sifive: add polling mode workaround
 for FU540-C000 SoC.

On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 8:22 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 07:41:18PM +0530, Sagar Shrikant Kadam wrote:
> > The i2c-ocore driver already has a polling mode interface.But it needs
> > a workaround for FU540 Chipset on HiFive unleashed board (RevA00).
> > There is an erratum in FU540 chip that prevents interrupt driven i2c
> > transfers from working, and also the I2C controller's interrupt bit
> > cannot be cleared if set, due to this the existing i2c polling mode
> > interface added in mainline earlier doesn't work, and CPU stall's
> > infinitely, when-ever i2c transfer is initiated.
> >
> > Ref:previous polling mode support in mainline
> >
> >       commit 69c8c0c0efa8 ("i2c: ocores: add polling interface")
> >
> > The workaround / fix under OCORES_FLAG_BROKEN_IRQ is particularly for
> > FU540-COOO SoC.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sagar Shrikant Kadam <sagar.kadam@...ive.com>
>
> Much better, thanks.
My pleasure Andrew.
Appreciate your timely review and response.

>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
>
>     Andrew

Thanks,
Sagar