[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4j-OQbN=rYY6MH3XFCF+dPpooCYekYF7PJL+N-tCJey3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 10:08:59 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chandan Rajendra <chandan@...ux.ibm.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dax: Fix last_page check in __bdev_dax_supported()
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 10:37 PM Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> writes:
>
> > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 10:55 PM Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Presently __bdev_dax_supported() checks if first sector of last
> >> page ( last_page ) on the block device is aligned to page
> >> boundary. However the code to compute 'last_page' assumes that there
> >> are 8 sectors/page assuming a 4K page-size.
> >>
> >> This assumption breaks on architectures which use a different page
> >> size specifically PPC64 where page-size == 64K. Hence a warning is
> >> seen while trying to mount a xfs/ext4 file-system with dax enabled:
> >>
> >> $ sudo mount -o dax /dev/pmem0 /mnt/pmem
> >> XFS (pmem0): DAX enabled. Warning: EXPERIMENTAL, use at your own risk
> >> XFS (pmem0): DAX unsupported by block device. Turning off DAX.
> >>
> >> The patch fixes this issue by updating calculation of 'last_var' to
> >> take into account number-of-sectors/page instead of assuming it to be
> >> '8'.
> >
> > Yes, I noticed this too and fixed it up in a wider change that also
> > allows device-mapper to validate each component device. Does this
> > patch work for you?
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/155789172402.748145.11853718580748830476.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com/
>
> Thanks Dan, I tested your patch and not seeing the issue anymore.
Thanks, I recorded a "Tested-by" for you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists