[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5CE2F337.9060207@baylibre.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 20:34:31 +0200
From: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
To: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
CC: khilman@...libre.com, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] ARM: meson: update with SPDX Licence identifier
Le 20/05/2019 20:06, Martin Blumenstingl a écrit :
> Hi Neil,
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 4:38 PM Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com> wrote:
>>
>> Update the SPDX Licence identifier for the Amlogic DT and mach-meson
>> files.
>>
>> Neil Armstrong (10):
>> ARM: dts: meson: update with SPDX Licence identifier
>> ARM: dts: meson6-atv1200: update with SPDX Licence identifier
>> ARM: dts: meson6: update with SPDX Licence identifier
>> ARM: dts: meson8-minix-neo-x8: update with SPDX Licence identifier
>> ARM: dts: meson8: update with SPDX Licence identifier
>> ARM: dts: meson8b-mxq: update with SPDX Licence identifier
>> ARM: dts: meson8b-odroidc1: update with SPDX Licence identifier
>> ARM: dts: meson8b: update with SPDX Licence identifier
> please check the .dts updates with my comment on the meson8b patch
> because I believe there are two typos (which managed to sneak into the
> rest of the patches)
You are right, thanks for pointing me to the licenses texts subtleties, I was misled by
the "of the GPL or the X11 license"... but looking closely clearly shows
a MIT license.
Will re-spin.
Neil
>
>
> Martin
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists