lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190520073529.nxptfbibexrqyzfi@flea>
Date:   Mon, 20 May 2019 09:35:29 +0200
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
To:     Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com>
Cc:     Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: watchdog: add Allwinner H6 watchdog

On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 05:23:52PM +0200, Clément Péron wrote:
> Allwinner H6 has a similar watchdog as the A64 which is already
> a compatible of the A31.
>
> This commit sort the lines and add the H6 compatible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/watchdog/sunxi-wdt.txt         | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/sunxi-wdt.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/sunxi-wdt.txt
> index 46055254e8dd..f4810f8ad1c5 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/sunxi-wdt.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/sunxi-wdt.txt
> @@ -3,10 +3,12 @@ Allwinner SoCs Watchdog timer
>  Required properties:
>
>  - compatible : should be one of
> -	"allwinner,sun4i-a10-wdt"
> -	"allwinner,sun6i-a31-wdt"
> -	"allwinner,sun50i-a64-wdt","allwinner,sun6i-a31-wdt"
> -	"allwinner,suniv-f1c100s-wdt", "allwinner,sun4i-a10-wdt"

That sorting was kind of intentional

> +	- "allwinner,sun4i-a10-wdt"
> +	- "allwinner,sun50i-a64-wdt","allwinner,sun6i-a31-wdt"
> +	- "allwinner,sun50i-h6-wdt","allwinner,sun50i-a64-wdt",
> +	  "allwinner,sun6i-a31-wdt"

Is there a reason to keep the A64 compatible?

Thanks,
Maxime

--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ