[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OSBPR01MB2103385D996762FA54F8E437B8060@OSBPR01MB2103.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 08:06:41 +0000
From: Biju Das <biju.das@...renesas.com>
To: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>
CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>,
Li Jun <jun.li@....com>,
Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@...gle.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Min Guo <min.guo@...iatek.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 4/6] usb: roles: add API to get usb_role_switch by node
Hi Heikki,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2019 9:04 AM
> To: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>; Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>; Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>;
> Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>; Adam Thomson
> <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>; Li Jun <jun.li@....com>;
> Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@...gle.com>; Hans de Goede
> <hdegoede@...hat.com>; Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>; Min Guo <min.guo@...iatek.com>;
> devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> usb@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-
> mediatek@...ts.infradead.org; Biju Das <biju.das@...renesas.com>; Linus
> Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] usb: roles: add API to get usb_role_switch by
> node
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:39:11AM +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On Fri, 2019-05-17 at 16:05 +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 01:37:36PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 04:47:21PM +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> > > > > Add fwnode_usb_role_switch_get() to make easier to get
> > > > > usb_role_switch by fwnode which register it.
> > > > > It's useful when there is not device_connection registered
> > > > > between two drivers and only knows the fwnode which register
> > > > > usb_role_switch.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>
> > > > > Tested-by: Biju Das <biju.das@...renesas.com>
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
> > >
> > > Hold on. I just noticed Rob's comment on patch 2/6, where he points
> > > out that you don't need to use device graph since the controller is
> > > the parent of the connector. Doesn't that mean you don't really need
> > > this API?
> > No, I still need it.
> > The change is about the way how to get fwnode; when use device graph,
> > get fwnode by of_graph_get_remote_node(); but now will get fwnode by
> > of_get_parent();
>
> OK, I get that, but I'm still not convinced about if something like this function
> is needed at all. I also have concerns regarding how you are using the
> function. I'll explain in comment to the patch 5/6 in this series...
FYI, Currently I am also using this api in my patch series.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10944637/
regards,
Biju
> > > > > ---
> > > > > v5 changes:
> > > > > 1. remove linux/of.h suggested by Biju 2. add tested by Biju
> > > > >
> > > > > Note: still depends on [1]
> > > > > [1]: [v6,08/13] usb: roles: Introduce stubs for the exiting functions in
> role.h
> > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10909971/
> > > > >
> > > > > v4 changes:
> > > > > 1. use switch_fwnode_match() to find fwnode suggested by Heikki
> > > > > 2. this patch now depends on [1]
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] [v6,08/13] usb: roles: Introduce stubs for the exiting functions in
> role.h
> > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10909971/
> > > > >
> > > > > v3 changes:
> > > > > 1. use fwnodes instead of node suggested by Andy
> > > > > 2. rebuild the API suggested by Heikki
> > > > >
> > > > > v2 no changes
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/usb/roles/class.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > include/linux/usb/role.h | 8 ++++++++
> > > > > 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/roles/class.c
> > > > > b/drivers/usb/roles/class.c index f45d8df5cfb8..4a1f09a41ec0
> > > > > 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/usb/roles/class.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/roles/class.c
> > > > > @@ -135,6 +135,30 @@ struct usb_role_switch
> > > > > *usb_role_switch_get(struct device *dev) }
> > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_role_switch_get);
> > > > >
> > > > > +/**
> > > > > + * fwnode_usb_role_switch_get - Find USB role switch by it's
> > > > > +parent fwnode
> > > > > + * @fwnode: The fwnode that register USB role switch
> > > > > + *
> > > > > + * Finds and returns role switch registered by @fwnode. The
> > > > > +reference count
> > > > > + * for the found switch is incremented.
> > > > > + */
> > > > > +struct usb_role_switch *
> > > > > +fwnode_usb_role_switch_get(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode) {
> > > > > + struct usb_role_switch *sw;
> > > > > + struct device *dev;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + dev = class_find_device(role_class, NULL, fwnode,
> switch_fwnode_match);
> > > > > + if (!dev)
> > > > > + return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + sw = to_role_switch(dev);
> > > > > + WARN_ON(!try_module_get(sw->dev.parent->driver-
> >owner));
> > > > > +
> > > > > + return sw;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fwnode_usb_role_switch_get);
> > >
> > > This function only basically converts the fwnode to usb_role_switch,
> > > but I would actually prefer that we walked through the device graph
> > > here instead of expecting the caller to do that.
> > >
> > > So this function should probable be called
> > > fwnode_to_usb_role_switch() and not fwnode_usb_role_switch_get(),
> > > but I guess you don't need it at all, right?
> > >
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> >
>
> --
> heikki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists