[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190520085539.GD19183@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 10:55:39 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Hariprasad Kelam <hariprasad.kelam@...il.com>
Cc: Emanuel Bennici <benniciemanuel78@...il.com>,
Vatsala Narang <vatsalanarang@...il.com>,
Nishka Dasgupta <nishka.dasgupta@...oo.com>,
Young Xiao <YangX92@...mail.com>,
Aymen Qader <qader.aymen@...il.com>,
Henriette Hofmeier <passt@...ofmeier.de>,
Hardik Singh Rathore <hardiksingh.k@...il.com>,
Madhumitha Prabakaran <madhumithabiw@...il.com>,
Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: core: rtw_mlme_ext: fix warning
Unneeded variable: "ret"
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 10:42:27PM +0530, Hariprasad Kelam wrote:
> This patch fixes below warnings reported by coccicheck
>
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:1888:14-17: Unneeded
> variable: "ret". Return "_FAIL" on line 1920
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:466:5-8: Unneeded
> variable: "res". Return "_SUCCESS" on line 494
>
> Signed-off-by: Hariprasad Kelam <hariprasad.kelam@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
> index d110d45..6a2eb66 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
> @@ -463,7 +463,6 @@ static u8 init_channel_set(struct adapter *padapter, u8 ChannelPlan, RT_CHANNEL_
>
> int init_mlme_ext_priv(struct adapter *padapter)
> {
> - int res = _SUCCESS;
> struct registry_priv *pregistrypriv = &padapter->registrypriv;
> struct mlme_ext_priv *pmlmeext = &padapter->mlmeextpriv;
> struct mlme_priv *pmlmepriv = &(padapter->mlmepriv);
> @@ -491,7 +490,7 @@ int init_mlme_ext_priv(struct adapter *padapter)
> pmlmeext->fixed_chan = 0xFF;
> #endif
>
> - return res;
> + return _SUCCESS;
If it can never fail, it should not be returning a value :(
Powered by blists - more mailing lists