lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 20 May 2019 11:39:29 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] firmware: Add support for loading compressed files

On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 11:26:42AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> this is a patch set to add the support for loading compressed firmware
> files.
> 
> The primary motivation is to reduce the storage size; e.g. currently
> the amount of /lib/firmware on my machine counts up to 419MB, and this
> can be reduced to 130MB file compression.  No bad deal.
> 
> The feature adds only fallback to the compressed file, so it should
> work as it was as long as the normal firmware file is present.  The
> f/w loader decompresses the content, so that there is no change needed
> in the caller side.
> 
> Currently only XZ format is supported.  A caveat is that the kernel XZ
> helper code supports only CRC32 (or none) integrity check type, so
> you'll have to compress the files via xz -C crc32 option.
> 
> The patch set begins with a few other improvements and refactoring,
> followed by the compression support.
> 
> In addition to this, dracut needs a small fix to deal with the *.xz
> files.
> 
> Also, the latest patchset is found in topic/fw-decompress branch of my
> sound.git tree:
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound.git

After a quick review, these all look good to me, nice job.

One recommendation, can we add support for testing this to the
tools/testing/selftests/firmware/ tests?  And you did run those
regression tests to verify that you didn't get any of the config options
messed up, right? :)

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ