lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7cce6762-006a-a21c-6400-6c0166428cf1@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 May 2019 12:36:30 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: Fix spinlock taken warning during host resume

On 17/05/19 10:49, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
> 
>  WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 13554 at kvm/arch/x86/kvm//../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:4183 kvm_resume+0x3c/0x40 [kvm]
>   CPU: 0 PID: 13554 Comm: step_after_susp Tainted: G           OE     5.1.0-rc4+ #1
>   RIP: 0010:kvm_resume+0x3c/0x40 [kvm]
>   Call Trace:
>    syscore_resume+0x63/0x2d0
>    suspend_devices_and_enter+0x9d1/0xa40
>    pm_suspend+0x33a/0x3b0
>    state_store+0x82/0xf0
>    kobj_attr_store+0x12/0x20
>    sysfs_kf_write+0x4b/0x60
>    kernfs_fop_write+0x120/0x1a0
>    __vfs_write+0x1b/0x40
>    vfs_write+0xcd/0x1d0
>    ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0
>    __x64_sys_write+0x1a/0x20
>    do_syscall_64+0x6f/0x6c0
>    entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
> 
> Commit ca84d1a24 (KVM: x86: Add clock sync request to hardware enable) mentioned 
> that "we always hold kvm_lock when hardware_enable is called.  The one place that 
> doesn't need to worry about it is resume, as resuming a frozen CPU, the spinlock 
> won't be taken." However, commit 6706dae9 (virt/kvm: Replace spin_is_locked() with 
> lockdep) introduces a bug, it asserts when the lock is not held which is contrary 
> to the original goal. 
> 
> This patch fixes it by WARN_ON when the lock is held.
> 
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
> ---
>  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 5fb0f16..c7eab5f 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -4096,7 +4096,7 @@ static int kvm_suspend(void)
>  static void kvm_resume(void)
>  {
>  	if (kvm_usage_count) {
> -		lockdep_assert_held(&kvm_count_lock);
> +		WARN_ON(lockdep_is_held(&kvm_count_lock));
>  		hardware_enable_nolock(NULL);
>  	}
>  }
> 

Queued, thanks.

Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ