lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 20 May 2019 12:58:21 +0200
From:   Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Cc:     intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] drm/i915: Tolerate file owned GEM contexts on hot unbind

On Friday, May 17, 2019 4:32:35 PM CEST Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Janusz Krzysztofik (2019-05-17 15:06:17)
> > From: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@...el.com>
> > 
> > During i915_driver_unload(), GEM contexts are verified restrictively
> > inside i915_gem_fini() if they don't consume shared resources which
> > should be cleaned up before the driver is released.  If those checks
> > don't result in kernel panic, one more check is performed at the end of
> > i915_gem_fini() which issues a WARN_ON() if GEM contexts still exist.
> 
> Just fix the underlying bug of this code being called too early. The
> assumptions we made for unload are clearly invalid when applied to
> unbind, and we need to split the phases.
> -Chris

Thanks Chris, I think I get it finally.

Janusz




Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ