[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3e462f1d-c9c0-ac26-ed59-182fbbf60340@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 13:19:40 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] KVM: selftests: Add the sync_regs test for s390x
On 16/05/19 13:12, Thomas Huth wrote:
> +#define VCPU_ID 5
> +
> +static void guest_code(void)
> +{
> + for (;;) {
> + asm volatile ("diag 0,0,0x501");
> + asm volatile ("ahi 11,1");
> + }
I'd like this to use something like
register u32 stage = 0 asm("11");
...
stage++
instead (yes, it should be fixed in x86 too).
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists