| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20190520115236.984256948@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 14:14:33 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 54/63] crypto: ccm - fix incompatibility between "ccm" and "ccm_base"
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
commit 6a1faa4a43f5fabf9cbeaa742d916e7b5e73120f upstream.
CCM instances can be created by either the "ccm" template, which only
allows choosing the block cipher, e.g. "ccm(aes)"; or by "ccm_base",
which allows choosing the ctr and cbcmac implementations, e.g.
"ccm_base(ctr(aes-generic),cbcmac(aes-generic))".
However, a "ccm_base" instance prevents a "ccm" instance from being
registered using the same implementations. Nor will the instance be
found by lookups of "ccm". This can be used as a denial of service.
Moreover, "ccm_base" instances are never tested by the crypto
self-tests, even if there are compatible "ccm" tests.
The root cause of these problems is that instances of the two templates
use different cra_names. Therefore, fix these problems by making
"ccm_base" instances set the same cra_name as "ccm" instances, e.g.
"ccm(aes)" instead of "ccm_base(ctr(aes-generic),cbcmac(aes-generic))".
This requires extracting the block cipher name from the name of the ctr
and cbcmac algorithms. It also requires starting to verify that the
algorithms are really ctr and cbcmac using the same block cipher, not
something else entirely. But it would be bizarre if anyone were
actually using non-ccm-compatible algorithms with ccm_base, so this
shouldn't break anyone in practice.
Fixes: 4a49b499dfa0 ("[CRYPTO] ccm: Added CCM mode")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
crypto/ccm.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
--- a/crypto/ccm.c
+++ b/crypto/ccm.c
@@ -455,7 +455,6 @@ static void crypto_ccm_free(struct aead_
static int crypto_ccm_create_common(struct crypto_template *tmpl,
struct rtattr **tb,
- const char *full_name,
const char *ctr_name,
const char *mac_name)
{
@@ -483,7 +482,8 @@ static int crypto_ccm_create_common(stru
mac = __crypto_hash_alg_common(mac_alg);
err = -EINVAL;
- if (mac->digestsize != 16)
+ if (strncmp(mac->base.cra_name, "cbcmac(", 7) != 0 ||
+ mac->digestsize != 16)
goto out_put_mac;
inst = kzalloc(sizeof(*inst) + sizeof(*ictx), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -506,23 +506,27 @@ static int crypto_ccm_create_common(stru
ctr = crypto_spawn_skcipher_alg(&ictx->ctr);
- /* Not a stream cipher? */
+ /* The skcipher algorithm must be CTR mode, using 16-byte blocks. */
err = -EINVAL;
- if (ctr->base.cra_blocksize != 1)
+ if (strncmp(ctr->base.cra_name, "ctr(", 4) != 0 ||
+ crypto_skcipher_alg_ivsize(ctr) != 16 ||
+ ctr->base.cra_blocksize != 1)
goto err_drop_ctr;
- /* We want the real thing! */
- if (crypto_skcipher_alg_ivsize(ctr) != 16)
+ /* ctr and cbcmac must use the same underlying block cipher. */
+ if (strcmp(ctr->base.cra_name + 4, mac->base.cra_name + 7) != 0)
goto err_drop_ctr;
err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
+ if (snprintf(inst->alg.base.cra_name, CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME,
+ "ccm(%s", ctr->base.cra_name + 4) >= CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME)
+ goto err_drop_ctr;
+
if (snprintf(inst->alg.base.cra_driver_name, CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME,
"ccm_base(%s,%s)", ctr->base.cra_driver_name,
mac->base.cra_driver_name) >= CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME)
goto err_drop_ctr;
- memcpy(inst->alg.base.cra_name, full_name, CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME);
-
inst->alg.base.cra_flags = ctr->base.cra_flags & CRYPTO_ALG_ASYNC;
inst->alg.base.cra_priority = (mac->base.cra_priority +
ctr->base.cra_priority) / 2;
@@ -564,7 +568,6 @@ static int crypto_ccm_create(struct cryp
const char *cipher_name;
char ctr_name[CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME];
char mac_name[CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME];
- char full_name[CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME];
cipher_name = crypto_attr_alg_name(tb[1]);
if (IS_ERR(cipher_name))
@@ -578,12 +581,7 @@ static int crypto_ccm_create(struct cryp
cipher_name) >= CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME)
return -ENAMETOOLONG;
- if (snprintf(full_name, CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME, "ccm(%s)", cipher_name) >=
- CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME)
- return -ENAMETOOLONG;
-
- return crypto_ccm_create_common(tmpl, tb, full_name, ctr_name,
- mac_name);
+ return crypto_ccm_create_common(tmpl, tb, ctr_name, mac_name);
}
static struct crypto_template crypto_ccm_tmpl = {
@@ -596,23 +594,17 @@ static int crypto_ccm_base_create(struct
struct rtattr **tb)
{
const char *ctr_name;
- const char *cipher_name;
- char full_name[CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME];
+ const char *mac_name;
ctr_name = crypto_attr_alg_name(tb[1]);
if (IS_ERR(ctr_name))
return PTR_ERR(ctr_name);
- cipher_name = crypto_attr_alg_name(tb[2]);
- if (IS_ERR(cipher_name))
- return PTR_ERR(cipher_name);
-
- if (snprintf(full_name, CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME, "ccm_base(%s,%s)",
- ctr_name, cipher_name) >= CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME)
- return -ENAMETOOLONG;
+ mac_name = crypto_attr_alg_name(tb[2]);
+ if (IS_ERR(mac_name))
+ return PTR_ERR(mac_name);
- return crypto_ccm_create_common(tmpl, tb, full_name, ctr_name,
- cipher_name);
+ return crypto_ccm_create_common(tmpl, tb, ctr_name, mac_name);
}
static struct crypto_template crypto_ccm_base_tmpl = {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists