[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190520115251.734458015@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 14:14:12 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 066/105] ext4: make sanity check in mballoc more strict
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
commit 31562b954b60f02acb91b7349dc6432d3f8c3c5f upstream.
The sanity check in mb_find_extent() only checked that returned extent
does not extend past blocksize * 8, however it should not extend past
EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb). This can happen when clusters_per_group <
blocksize * 8 and the tail of the bitmap is not properly filled by 1s
which happened e.g. when ancient kernels have grown the filesystem.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: stable@...nel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -1539,7 +1539,7 @@ static int mb_find_extent(struct ext4_bu
ex->fe_len += 1 << order;
}
- if (ex->fe_start + ex->fe_len > (1 << (e4b->bd_blkbits + 3))) {
+ if (ex->fe_start + ex->fe_len > EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(e4b->bd_sb)) {
/* Should never happen! (but apparently sometimes does?!?) */
WARN_ON(1);
ext4_error(e4b->bd_sb, "corruption or bug in mb_find_extent "
Powered by blists - more mailing lists