[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190520142333.390091d5@xps13>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 14:23:33 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: masonccyang@...c.com.tw
Cc: bbrezillon@...nel.org, broonie@...nel.org,
christophe.kerello@...com, computersforpeace@...il.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, dwmw2@...radead.org,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, juliensu@...c.com.tw, lee.jones@...aro.org,
liang.yang@...ogic.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com, marek.vasut@...il.com,
mark.rutland@....com, paul.burton@...s.com, richard@....at,
robh+dt@...nel.org, stefan@...er.ch, zhengxunli@...c.com.tw
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] mtd: rawnand: Add Macronix MX25F0A NAND
controller
Hi Mason,
masonccyang@...c.com.tw wrote on Fri, 17 May 2019 17:30:21 +0800:
> Hi Miquel,
>
> > > +
> > > +static void mxic_nand_select_chip(struct nand_chip *chip, int chipnr)
> >
> > _select_target() is preferred now
>
> Do you mean I implement mxic_nand_select_target() to control #CS ?
>
> If so, I need to call mxic_nand_select_target( ) to control #CS ON
> and then #CS OFF in _exec_op() due to nand_select_target()<in nand_base,c>
> is still calling chip->legacy.select_chip ?
You must forget about the ->select_chip() callback. Now it should be
handled directly from the controller driver. Please have a look at the
commit pointed against the marvell_nand.c driver.
[...]
> > > + if (!mxic)
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > + nand_chip = &mxic->nand;
> > > + mtd = nand_to_mtd(nand_chip);
> > > + mtd->dev.parent = pdev->dev.parent;
> > > + nand_chip->ecc.priv = NULL;
> > > + nand_set_flash_node(nand_chip, pdev->dev.parent->of_node);
> > > + nand_chip->priv = mxic;
> > > +
> > > + mxic->mfd = mfd;
> > > +
> > > + nand_chip->legacy.select_chip = mxic_nand_select_chip;
> >
> > Please don't implement legacy interfaces. You can check in
> > marvell_nand.c how this is handled now:
> >
> > b25251414f6e mtd: rawnand: marvell: Stop implementing ->select_chip()
> >
>
> Does it mean chip->legacy.select_chip() will phase-out ?
Yes it will.
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists