linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 6/9] perf diff: Link same basic blocks among different data files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 20 May 2019 21:27:53 +0800
From:   Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
To:     acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com
Cc:     Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
        kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com,
        Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 6/9] perf diff: Link same basic blocks among different data files

The target is to compare the performance difference (cycles
diff) for the same basic blocks in different data files.

The same basic block means same function, same start address
and same end address. This patch finds the same basic blocks
from different data files and link them together.

Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
---
 tools/perf/builtin-diff.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c b/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
index 09551fe..72c33ab 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
@@ -1073,8 +1073,69 @@ static int process_block_per_sym(struct data__file *d)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int block_pair_cmp(struct hist_entry *a, struct hist_entry *b)
+{
+	struct block_info *bi_a = a->block_info;
+	struct block_info *bi_b = b->block_info;
+	int cmp;
+
+	if (!bi_a->sym || !bi_b->sym)
+		return -1;
+
+	if (bi_a->sym->name && bi_b->sym->name) {
+		cmp = strcmp(bi_a->sym->name, bi_b->sym->name);
+		if ((!cmp) && (bi_a->start == bi_b->start) &&
+		    (bi_a->end == bi_b->end)) {
+			return 0;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return -1;
+}
+
+static struct hist_entry *get_block_pair(struct hist_entry *he,
+					 struct hists *hists_pair)
+{
+	struct rb_root_cached *root = hists_pair->entries_in;
+	struct rb_node *next = rb_first_cached(root);
+	int cmp;
+
+	while (next != NULL) {
+		struct hist_entry *he_pair = rb_entry(next, struct hist_entry,
+						      rb_node_in);
+
+		next = rb_next(&he_pair->rb_node_in);
+
+		cmp = block_pair_cmp(he_pair, he);
+		if (!cmp)
+			return he_pair;
+	}
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static void block_hists_match(struct hists *hists_base,
+			      struct hists *hists_pair)
+{
+	struct rb_root_cached *root = hists_base->entries_in;
+	struct rb_node *next = rb_first_cached(root);
+
+	while (next != NULL) {
+		struct hist_entry *he = rb_entry(next, struct hist_entry,
+						 rb_node_in);
+		struct hist_entry *pair = get_block_pair(he, hists_pair);
+
+		next = rb_next(&he->rb_node_in);
+
+		if (pair)
+			hist_entry__add_pair(pair, he);
+	}
+}
+
 static void basic_block_process(void)
 {
+	struct hists *hists_base = &data__files[0].block_hists.hists;
+	struct hists *hists;
 	struct data__file *d;
 	int i;
 
@@ -1085,6 +1146,11 @@ static void basic_block_process(void)
 		process_block_per_sym(d);
 	}
 
+	data__for_each_file_new(i, d) {
+		hists = &d->block_hists.hists;
+		block_hists_match(hists_base, hists);
+	}
+
 	data__for_each_file(i, d) {
 		hists__delete_entries(&d->block_hists.sym_hists);
 		hists__delete_entries(&d->block_hists.hists);
-- 
2.7.4