[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJMQK-iZRHO6HBkycPt0yz_vndmmmqFL0duHOcQ8EFSdhhFZcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 12:09:39 +0800
From: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
To: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Jun Yao <yaojun8558363@...il.com>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] fdt: add support for rng-seed
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 7:54 AM Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org> wrote:
> Alphabetical order.
Original headers are not sorted, should I sort them here?
>
>
> I'm a little bit concerned about this, as we really want the rng-seed
> value to be wiped, and not kept in memory (even if it's hard to
> access).
>
> IIUC, fdt_delprop splices the device tree, so it'll override
> "rng-seed" property with whatever device tree entries follow it.
> However, if rng-seed is the last property (or if the entries that
> follow are smaller than rng-seed), the seed will stay in memory (or
> part of it).
>
> fdt_nop_property in v2 would erase it for sure. I don't know if there
> is a way to make sure that rng-seed is removed for good while still
> deleting the property (maybe modify fdt_splice_ to do a memset(.., 0)
> of the moved chunk?).
>
So maybe we can use fdt_nop_property() back?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists