lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f16b7eb7-411a-cac4-f8ec-b34a7731166c@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 May 2019 22:40:15 +0200
From:   Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
To:     Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>, pavel@....cz
Cc:     lee.jones@...aro.org, rdunlap@...radead.org,
        linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] leds: lm36274: Introduce the TI LM36274 LED driver

On 5/21/19 9:41 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Jacek
> 
> On 5/21/19 1:46 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>> Dan,
>>
>> On 5/21/19 8:25 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>> Jacek
>>>
>>> On 5/21/19 12:40 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>>>> On 5/20/19 11:19 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>>>> Jacek
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/20/19 2:54 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Dan,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/7/19 10:11 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>>>>>> Introduce the LM36274 LED driver.  This driver uses the ti-lmu
>>>>>>> MFD driver to probe this LED driver.  The driver configures only the
>>>>>>> LED registers and enables the outputs according to the config file.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The driver utilizes the TI LMU (Lighting Management Unit) LED common
>>>>>>> framework to set the brightness bits.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>      drivers/leds/Kconfig        |   7 ++
>>>>>>>      drivers/leds/Makefile       |   1 +
>>>>>>>      drivers/leds/leds-lm36274.c | 174 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>      3 files changed, 182 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>      create mode 100644 drivers/leds/leds-lm36274.c
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/leds/Kconfig b/drivers/leds/Kconfig
>>>>>>> index 255fdd5e8491..db83a3feca01 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/leds/Kconfig
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/leds/Kconfig
>>>>>>> @@ -791,6 +791,13 @@ config LEDS_LM3697
>>>>>>>            Say Y to enable the LM3697 LED driver for TI LMU devices.
>>>>>>>            This supports the LED device LM3697.
>>>>>>>      +config LEDS_LM36274
>>>>>>> +    tristate "LED driver for LM36274"
>>>>>>> +    depends on LEDS_TI_LMU_COMMON
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Shouldn't we have "depends on MFD_TI_LMU" as well here?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually the LEDS_TI_LMU_COMMON flag should depend on MFD_TI_LMU.
>>>>> Then it would inherit that dependency.
>>>>
>>>> LEDS_TI_LMU_COMMON does not seem too have any dependency on MFD_TI_LMU,
>>>> and it would be incorrect to require enabling MFD_TI_LMU for all drivers
>>>> depending on TI_LMU_COMMON, that can be probed on their own, like
>>>> leds-lm3697.c .
>>>>
>>>
>>> Correct.
>>>
>>> I can update the Kconfigs unless you want to ammend the commits.
>>
>> I added "depends on MFD_TI_LMU" to "config LEDS_LM36274".
>> Please verify your patch sets pushed to [0].
>>
> 
> Pulled
> Built
> tested
> verified
> 
> Good to go
Thanks! Merged.

-- 
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ