[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKgT0UcR3q1maBmJz7xj_i+_oux_6FQxua9DOjXQSZzyq6FhkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 16:22:17 -0700
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
To: Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>
Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] i40e X722 RSS problem with NAT-Traversal IPsec packets
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:55 AM Lennart Sorensen
<lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 09:51:33AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > I think we need to narrow this down a bit more. Let's try forcing the
> > lookup table all to one value and see if traffic is still going to
> > queue 0.
> >
> > Specifically what we need to is run the following command to try and
> > force all RSS traffic to queue 8, you can verify the result with
> > "ethtool -x":
> > ethtool -X <iface> weight 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
> >
> > If that works and the IPSec traffic goes to queue 8 then we are likely
> > looking at some sort of input issue, either in the parsing or the
> > population of things like the input mask that we can then debug
> > further.
> >
> > If traffic still goes to queue 0 then that tells us the output of the
> > RSS hash and lookup table are being ignored, this would imply either
> > some other filter is rerouting the traffic or is directing us to limit
> > the queue index to 0 bits.
>
> # ethtool -x eth2
> RX flow hash indirection table for eth2 with 12 RX ring(s):
> 0: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
> 8: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
> 16: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
> 24: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
> 32: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
> ...
> 472: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
> 480: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
> 488: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
> 496: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
> 504: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
> RSS hash key:
> 0b:1f:ae:ed:60:04:7d:e5:8a:2b:43:3f:1d:ee:6c:99:89:29:94:b0:25:db:c7:4b:fa:da:4d:3f:e8:cc:bc:00:ad:32:01:d6:1c:30:3f:f8:79:3e:f4:48:04:1f:51:d2:5a:39:f0:90
> root@ECA:~# ethtool --show-priv-flags eth2
> Private flags for eth2:
> MFP : off
> LinkPolling : off
> flow-director-atr: off
> veb-stats : off
> hw-atr-eviction : on
> legacy-rx : off
>
> All ipsec packets are still hitting queue 0.
>
> Seems it is completely ignoring RSS for these packets. That is
> impressively weird.
>
> --
> Len Sorensen
So we are either using 0 bits of the LUT or we are just not performing
hashing because this is somehow being parsed into a type that doesn't
support it.
I have attached 2 more patches we can test. The first enables hashing
on what are called "OAM" packets, The thing is we shouldn't be
identifying these packets as "OAM", Operations Administration &
Management, as normally it would have to be recognized as a tunnel
first and then have a specific flag set in either the GENEVE or
VXLAN-GPE header. The second patch will dump the contents of the
HREGION registers. They should all be 0, however I thought it best to
dump the contents and verify that since I know that these registers
can be used to change the traffic class of a given packet type and if
we are encountering that it might be moving it to an uninitialized TC
which would be using queue offset 0 with 0 bits of the LUT.
These last 2 patches would pretty much eliminate the entire RSS
subsystem. If we don't see HREGION values set and the OAM flags have
no effect I can only assume there is something going on with the
parser in the NIC since it isn't recognizing the packet type.
Thanks.
- Alex
View attachment "i40e-enable-oam-flag-tunnel.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1199 bytes)
View attachment "i40e-dump-extra-hregion.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (933 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists