[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <93b363ad62f4938d9ddf3e05b2a61e3f66b2dcd3.1558416473.git.sbobroff@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 15:28:39 +1000
From: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@...ux.ibm.com>
To: kraxel@...hat.com, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] drm/bochs: Fix connector leak during driver unload
When unloading the bochs-drm driver, a warning message is printed by
drm_mode_config_cleanup() because a reference is still held to one of
the drm_connector structs.
Correct this by calling drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() in
bochs_pci_remove().
The issue is caused by the interaction of two previous commits. Both
together are required to cause it:
Fixes: 846c7dfc1193 ("drm/atomic: Try to preserve the crtc enabled state in drm_atomic_remove_fb, v2.")
Fixes: 6579c39594ae ("drm/bochs: atomic: switch planes to atomic, wire up helpers.")
Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@...ux.ibm.com>
---
Hello,
This seems to be similar to an issue I recently fixed for the AST driver:
1e613f3c630c ("drm/ast: Fix connector leak during driver unload")
Which is similar to at least one other recent fix:
192b4af6cd28 ("drm/tegra: Shutdown on driver unbind")
The fix seems to be the same, but this time I've tried to dig a little deeper
and use an appropriate Fixes tag to assist backporting.
Bisecting the issue for commits to drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/ points to:
6579c39594ae ("drm/bochs: atomic: switch planes to atomic, wire up helpers.")
... but the issue also seems to be due to a change in the generic drm code
(reverting it separately fixes the issue):
846c7dfc1193 ("drm/atomic: Try to preserve the crtc enabled state in drm_atomic_remove_fb, v2.")
... so I've included both in the commit. Is that the right thing to do?
I couldn't help wondering if we should also update the comment for
drm_fbdev_generic_setup(), because it says:
"The fbdev is destroyed by drm_dev_unregister()"
... which implies to me that cleanup only requires that call, but actually
since 846c7dfc1193 you will always(?) need to use drm_atomic_helper_shutdown()
as well. (Is it actually always the case?)
Cheers,
Sam.
drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_drv.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_drv.c
index 6b6e037258c3..7031f0168795 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_drv.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <drm/drm_fb_helper.h>
#include <drm/drm_probe_helper.h>
+#include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h>
#include "bochs.h"
@@ -174,6 +175,7 @@ static void bochs_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
struct drm_device *dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(dev);
drm_dev_unregister(dev);
bochs_unload(dev);
drm_dev_put(dev);
--
2.19.0.2.gcad72f5712
Powered by blists - more mailing lists