linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v2 00/11] DVFS in the OPP core

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190521062248.ogjetb2rwtqekflx@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Tue, 21 May 2019 11:52:48 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, swboyd@...omium.org,
        ulf.hansson@...aro.org, dianders@...omium.org, rafael@...nel.org,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 00/11] DVFS in the OPP core

On 20-03-19, 15:19, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> This is a v2 of the RFC posted earlier by Stephen Boyd [1]
> 
> As part of v2 I still follow the same approach of dev_pm_opp_set_rate()
> API using clk framework to round the frequency passed and making it
> accept 0 as a valid frequency indicating the frequency isn't required
> anymore. It just has a few more drivers converted to use this approach
> like dsi/dpu and ufs.
> ufs demonstrates the case of having to handle multiple power domains, one
> of which is scalable.
> 
> The patches are based on 5.1-rc1 and depend on some ufs fixes I posted
> earlier [2] and a DT patch to include the rpmpd header [3]
> 
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/1/28/2086
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/3/8/70
> [3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/3/20/120

Hi Rajendra,

I am inclined to apply/push this series for 5.3-rc1, will it be
possible for you to spend some time on this at priority ?

-- 
viresh