linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v5 13/16] slub: Enable balancing slabs across nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190521010404.GB9552@tower.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 May 2019 01:04:10 +0000
From:   Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
To:     "Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@...nel.org>
CC:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
        "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
        "David Rientjes" <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
        "Tycho Andersen" <tycho@...ho.ws>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        Nick Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 13/16] slub: Enable balancing slabs across nodes

On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 03:40:14PM +1000, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> We have just implemented Slab Movable Objects (SMO).  On NUMA systems
> slabs can become unbalanced i.e. many slabs on one node while other
> nodes have few slabs.  Using SMO we can balance the slabs across all
> the nodes.
> 
> The algorithm used is as follows:
> 
>  1. Move all objects to node 0 (this has the effect of defragmenting the
>     cache).

This already sounds dangerous (or costly). Can't it be done without
cross-node data moves?

> 
>  2. Calculate the desired number of slabs for each node (this is done
>     using the approximation nr_slabs / nr_nodes).

So that on this step only (actual data size - desired data size) has
to be moved?

Thanks!