[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87pnocm59v.fsf@haabendal.dk>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 13:11:08 +0200
From: Esben Haabendal <esben@...bendal.dk>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] serial: 8250: Add support for 8250/16550 as MFD function
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
>> I will try ad hold back with this thread until you get back to it.
>
> Ok, I have no idea what is going on here, sorry. This is a really long
> and meandering thread, and I can't even find the original patches in my
> queue.
>
> So can you resend things and we can start over? :)
Will do.
> But note, using a mfd for a uart seems VERY odd to me...
Ok. In my case, I have a pcie card with an fpga which includes 5 uart
ports, 3 ethernet interfaces and a number of custom IP blocks.
I believe that an mfd driver for that pcie card in that case.
/Esben
Powered by blists - more mailing lists