linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] i2c: core: Move ACPI IRQ handling to probe time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190521112728.GX2781@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 May 2019 14:27:28 +0300
From:   Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Cc:     wsa@...-dreams.de, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com, jbroadus@...il.com,
        patches@...nsource.cirrus.com,
        Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] i2c: core: Move ACPI IRQ handling to probe time

On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 09:49:34AM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
> Bring the ACPI path in sync with the device tree path and handle all the
> IRQ fetching at probe time. This leaves the only IRQ handling at device
> registration time being that which is passed directly through the board
> info as either a resource or an actual IRQ number.

I don't see issues with this approach. Cc'd Jarkko and Andy just in case
I missed something.

One minor stylistic comment, see below.

> Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c | 6 ++----
>  drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 6 +++++-
>  drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h      | 7 +++++++
>  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
> index 764cd10420a74..e332760bf9ebc 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
> @@ -148,8 +148,9 @@ static int i2c_acpi_add_resource(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
>  	return 1; /* No need to add resource to the list */
>  }
>  
> -static int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct acpi_device *adev, int *irq)
> +int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct i2c_client *client, int *irq)
>  {
> +	struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(&client->adapter->dev);
>  	struct list_head resource_list;
>  	int ret;
>  
> @@ -201,9 +202,6 @@ static int i2c_acpi_get_info(struct acpi_device *adev,
>  	if (adapter_handle)
>  		*adapter_handle = lookup.adapter_handle;
>  
> -	/* Then fill IRQ number if any */
> -	i2c_acpi_get_irq(adev, &info->irq);
> -
>  	acpi_set_modalias(adev, dev_name(&adev->dev), info->type,
>  			  sizeof(info->type));
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> index 84bf11b25a120..c1afa17a76bfc 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> @@ -335,7 +335,11 @@ static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
>  			if (irq == -EINVAL || irq == -ENODATA)
>  				irq = of_irq_get(dev->of_node, 0);
>  		} else if (ACPI_COMPANION(dev)) {
> -			irq = acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(ACPI_COMPANION(dev), 0);
> +			i2c_acpi_get_irq(client, &irq);
> +
> +			if (irq == -ENOENT)
> +				irq = acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(ACPI_COMPANION(dev),
> +							    0);

I think this looks better if you put everything one line:

				irq = acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(ACPI_COMPANION(dev), 0);

>  		}
>  		if (irq == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>  			return irq;
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h
> index 8f3a08dc73a25..6bec145ab7d74 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h
> @@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ const struct acpi_device_id *
>  i2c_acpi_match_device(const struct acpi_device_id *matches,
>  		      struct i2c_client *client);
>  void i2c_acpi_register_devices(struct i2c_adapter *adap);
> +
> +int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct i2c_client *client, int *irq);
>  #else /* CONFIG_ACPI */
>  static inline void i2c_acpi_register_devices(struct i2c_adapter *adap) { }
>  static inline const struct acpi_device_id *
> @@ -80,6 +82,11 @@ i2c_acpi_match_device(const struct acpi_device_id *matches,
>  {
>  	return NULL;
>  }
> +
> +static inline int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct i2c_client *client, int *irq)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
>  #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
>  extern struct notifier_block i2c_acpi_notifier;
>  
> -- 
> 2.11.0