linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: Add lradc node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190521130955.3omqwpx3i7njsb3t@flea>
Date:   Tue, 21 May 2019 15:09:55 +0200
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
To:     luca@...tu.xyz
Cc:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Allwinner sunXi SoC support" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: Add lradc node

On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 08:43:45AM +0200, luca@...tu.xyz wrote:
> On May 20, 2019 1:07:42 PM GMT+02:00, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com> wrote:
> >On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 07:09:30PM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote:
> >> Add a node describing the KEYADC on the A64.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi | 7 +++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> >b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> >> index 7734f70e1057..dc1bf8c1afb5 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> >> @@ -704,6 +704,13 @@
> >>  			status = "disabled";
> >>  		};
> >>
> >> +		lradc: lradc@...1800 {
> >> +			compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-lradc-keys";
> >> +			reg = <0x01c21800 0x100>;
> >> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 30 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> >> +			status = "disabled";
> >> +		};
> >> +
> >
> >The controller is pretty different on the A64 compared to the A10. The
> >A10 has two channels for example, while the A64 has only one.
> >
> >It looks like the one in the A83t though, so you can use that
> >compatible instead.
>
> Looking at the patch for the A83t, the only difference is that it
> uses a 3/4 instead of a 2/3 voltage divider, nothing is changed with
> the channels.

I guess you can reuse the A83t compatible here then, and a more
specific a64 compatible in case we ever need to fix this.

> But I'm also not sure which one (or a different one)
> is used from looking at the "A64 User Manual".

I'm sorry, what are you referring to with "one" in that sentence?

Maxime

--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)