[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190521131104.GB99937@ediswmail.ad.cirrus.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 14:11:04 +0100
From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
<wsa@...-dreams.de>, <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>, <jbroadus@...il.com>,
<patches@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] i2c: core: Move ACPI IRQ handling to probe time
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 03:57:04PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 02:27:28PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 09:49:34AM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
> > > Bring the ACPI path in sync with the device tree path and handle all the
> > > IRQ fetching at probe time. This leaves the only IRQ handling at device
> > > registration time being that which is passed directly through the board
> > > info as either a resource or an actual IRQ number.
> >
> > I don't see issues with this approach. Cc'd Jarkko and Andy just in case
> > I missed something.
>
> I failed to see the i2c_acpi_get_irq() in the current code.
> What kernel version do you use?
> Can we see the changes against vanilla / i2c-next?
>
It's added by the first patch in the chain:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/20/281
I could resend the series with you and Jarkko on CC if that would
be better.
Thanks,
Charles
Powered by blists - more mailing lists