lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 21 May 2019 09:33:17 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "Naveen N . Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Enable new kprobe event at boot

On Tue, 21 May 2019 16:56:16 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:

> Note that 'trace_event=' option enables trace event at very early
> timing, but the events added by 'kprobe_event=' are enabled right
> before enabling device drivers at this point. It is enough for
> tracing device driver initialization etc.

Nice!

I wonder if we can have this called before the trace_event boot is
analyzed. Then have the kprobe_event work more like the kprobe_events
file, and not enable the kprobes but only create them. If you want to
enable them you do a trace_event=kprobes as well.

Perhaps we could enable kprobes at early init?

What do you think? Or is there something else in kprobes that prevents
such an early enabling of it?

-- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ