linux-kernel - [PATCH] HID: multitouch: handle faulty Elo touch device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190521133831.4436-1-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 May 2019 15:38:31 +0200
From:   Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
To:     Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
        Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Subject: [PATCH] HID: multitouch: handle faulty Elo touch device

Since kernel v5.0, one single win8 touchscreen device failed.
And it turns out this is because it reports 2 InRange usage per touch.

It's a first, and I *really* wonder how this was allowed by Microsoft in
the first place. But IIRC, Breno told me this happened *after* a firmware
upgrade...

Anyway, better be safe for those crappy devices, and make sure we have
a full slot before jumping to the next.
This won't prevent all crappy devices to fail here, but at least we will
have a safeguard as long as the contact ID and the X and Y coordinates
are placed in the report after the grabage.

Reported-and-tested-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
---
 drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
index ef635964cfe1..a344a3cf5398 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
@@ -642,6 +642,13 @@ static void mt_store_field(struct hid_device *hdev,
 	if (*target != DEFAULT_TRUE &&
 	    *target != DEFAULT_FALSE &&
 	    *target != DEFAULT_ZERO) {
+		if (usage->contactid == DEFAULT_ZERO ||
+		    usage->x == DEFAULT_ZERO ||
+		    usage->y == DEFAULT_ZERO) {
+			hid_dbg(hdev,
+				"ignoring duplicate usage on incomplete");
+			return;
+		}
 		usage = mt_allocate_usage(hdev, application);
 		if (!usage)
 			return;
-- 
2.19.2