[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190521171855.GN9224@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 20:18:55 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Cc: wsa@...-dreams.de, mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com,
jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com, jbroadus@...il.com,
patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] i2c: core: Move ACPI IRQ handling to probe time
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 04:05:00PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
> Bring the ACPI path in sync with the device tree path and handle all the
> IRQ fetching at probe time. This leaves the only IRQ handling at device
> registration time being that which is passed directly through the board
> info as either a resource or an actual IRQ number.
> -static int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct acpi_device *adev, int *irq)
> +int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct i2c_client *client, int *irq)
Instead of ping-pong style of the programming, I would rather do this in the
same patch, where you introduce a helper (patch 2 I suppose, after my comments
against current patch 2 in the series).
Also possible to split exporting itself to a separate patch.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists