[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjit1=wf-JxUebS4_9WUCKbnfGPt0QF13-LijmumMEB-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 12:54:13 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/lock_events: Use this_cpu_add() when necessary
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:40 AM Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT) && \
> + (defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT) || !defined(CONFIG_X86))
> +#define lockevent_percpu_inc(x) this_cpu_inc(x)
> +#define lockevent_percpu_add(x, v) this_cpu_add(x, v)
Why that CONFIG_X86 special case?
On x86, the regular non-underscore versionm is perfectly fine, and the
underscore is no faster or simpler.
So just make it be
#if defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT)
.. non-underscore versions..
#else
.. underscore versions ..
#endif
and realize that x86 simply doesn't _care_. On x86, it will be one
single instruction regardless.
Non-x86 may prefer the underscore versions for the non-preempt case.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists