lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190522195804.GC21412@chatter.i7.local>
Date:   Wed, 22 May 2019 15:58:04 -0400
From:   Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PSA: Do not use "Reported-By" without reporter's approval

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:45:06PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>> It is common courtesy to include this tagline when submitting 
>> patches:
>>
>> Reported-By: J. Doe <jdoe@...mple.com>
>>
>> Please ask the reporter's permission before doing so (even if they'd
>> submitted a public bugzilla report or sent a report to the mailing
>> list).
>
>I disagree with this.
>
>If the report is public, and lists like vger are public,
>then using a Reported-by: and/or a Link: are simply useful
>history and tracking information.

I'm perfectly fine with Link:, however Reported-By: usually has the 
person's name and email address (i.e. PII data per GDPR definition). If 
that person submitted the bug report via bugzilla.kernel.org or a 
similar resource, their expectation is that they can delete their 
account should they choose to to do so. However, if the patch containing 
Reported-By is committed to git, their PII becomes permanently and 
immutably recorded for any reasonable meaning of the word "forever."

Now, I'm pretty sure that a request to rebase git history to edit a 
commit message would be considered "unreasonable" under GDPR provisions, 
but a) it still eats up valuable time handling such requests and b) it's 
a consequence reporters are not aware of when they submit bug reports.  
So, my request to ask for permission before using "Reported-By" is not 
coming from any legal position, but from the perspective of courtesy to 
people submitting those reports.

-K

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ